GeForce GTX 260 vs FirePro D500

Place in the ranking	422	744
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.14
Power efficiency	2.75	1.21
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	Tahiti	GT200
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 January 2014 (10 years ago)	16 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	192
Core clock speed	725 MHz	576 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	182 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	69.60	36.86
Floating-point processing power	2.227 TFLOPS	0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	28
TMUs	96	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	279 mm	267 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	896 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	448 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	999 MHz
Memory bandwidth	243.8 GB/s	111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	Dual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.83	3.16
Recency	18 January 2014	16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	896 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	182 Watt

FirePro D500 has a 242.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 242.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 260, on the other hand, has 50.5% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.