Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs FirePro A300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTrinity GLPonte Vecchio
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416384
Core clock speed760 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed905 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate21.721,638
Floating-point processing power0.695 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs241024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 600 Watt

FirePro A300 has 823.1% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1550, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro A300 and Data Center GPU Max 1550. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
Data Center GPU Max 1550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 21 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.