Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated185
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.69
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameCedarNavi 12
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)1 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802304
Core clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000230.4
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 225 Watt

ATI 2460 Multi-View has 1223.5% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2460 Multi-View and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
FirePro 2460 Multi-View
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2460 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2460 Multi-View or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.