RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated35
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.35
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV620no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2009 (15 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores407424
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors181 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate1.600no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x VHDCIno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 150 Watt

ATI 2450 Multi-View has 368.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2450 Multi-View and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
FirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.