GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2005−2008)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRV380GB207
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2008 (16 years ago)2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed250 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors75 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data12.9 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1PCIe 5.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed406 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.496 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VHDCI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-10.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 115 Watt

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 has 475% lower power consumption.

RTX 5050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.