GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.50
ArchitectureR300 (2005−2008)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV370GA106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2006 (18 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed324 MHz1515 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors107 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate1.296140.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length170 mm242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed392 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.136 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

ATI FireMV 2200 has 766.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 OEM, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2200 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2200
FireMV 2200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 160 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.