A30 PCIe vs ATI FireMV 2200 PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV280GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2006 (18 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed240 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors36 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate0.96322.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4224
Tensor Coresno data224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MBps1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s933.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.1N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.4N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 165 Watt

ATI FireMV 2200 PCI has 1000% lower power consumption.

A30 PCIe, on the other hand, has a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2200 PCI and A30 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2200 PCI is a desktop card while A30 PCIe is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
FireMV 2200 PCI
NVIDIA A30 PCIe
A30 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate A30 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.