Arc 3 A370M vs ATI FireGL X1-256

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameR300DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed325 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors110 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.60099.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 3 A370M has an age advantage of 19 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 2400% more advanced lithography process, and 5.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X1-256 and Arc 3 A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X1-256 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 3 A370M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL X1-256
FireGL X1-256
Intel Arc 3 A370M
Arc 3 A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 12 votes

Rate Arc 3 A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.