HD Graphics 400 vs ATI FireGL V7600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1073
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.02
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameR600Braswell GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 November 2007 (17 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24096
Core clock speed600 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data640 MHz
Number of transistors720 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)127 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2007.680
Floating-point processing power0.288 TFLOPS0.1229 TFLOPS
ROPs122
TMUs1212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.3
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2007 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 127 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 2016.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7600 and HD Graphics 400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7600 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7600
FireGL V7600
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 404 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.