Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs ATI FireGL V7350
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | R500 (2005−2007) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | R520 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 October 2005 (18 years ago) | 1 June 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1138 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1301 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 321 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 111 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 9.600 | 291.4 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 9.326 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 409.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2005 | 1 June 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 111 Watt | 120 Watt |
ATI FireGL V7350 has 8.1% lower power consumption.
RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FireGL V7350 and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FireGL V7350 is a workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
