ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX vs ATI FireGL V7350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameR520RV670
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (19 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed600 MHz777 MHz
Number of transistors321 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)111 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60012.43
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4973 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz1126 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s72.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.03.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 111 Watt 110 Watt

ATI FireGL V7350 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI HD 2950 XTX, on the other hand, has a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 0.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7350 and Radeon HD 2950 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 2950 XTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7350
FireGL V7350
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
Radeon HD 2950 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2950 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.