HD Graphics 4000 vs ATI FireGL V7200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1065
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Power efficiencyno data1.83
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameR520Ivy Bridge GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2005 (19 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,279 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed600 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors312 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no dataunknown
Texture fill rate9.60016.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.256 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed650 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.14.0
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm

HD Graphics 4000 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7200 and HD Graphics 4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7200 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7200
FireGL V7200
Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 5206 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.