Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FireGL V5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV530Ellesmere
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2005 (18 years ago)24 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed600 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors157 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400179.0
Floating-point performanceno data5.728 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 24 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

ATI FireGL V5200 has 614.3% lower power consumption.

Pro Duo Polaris, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V5200 and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V5200
FireGL V5200
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate FireGL V5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.