RTX A400 vs ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameR360GA107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2003 (20 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed412 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistors117 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.29642.29

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed688 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth22.02 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX A400 has an age advantage of 20 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9800 X2-256T and RTX A400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9800 X2-256T is a workstation graphics card while RTX A400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T
FireGL 9800 X2-256T
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.