Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs Edge 3D 3400XL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV1Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 1995 (28 years ago)28 January 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed60 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistors1 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate0.063.976
Floating-point performanceno data0.1272 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Length191 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed60 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth480 MB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 500 nm 28 nm

R2 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Edge 3D 3400XL and Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Edge 3D 3400XL is a desktop card while Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Edge 3D 3400XL
Edge 3D 3400XL
AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Edge 3D 3400XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 31 vote

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.