Radeon R9 A375 vs Edge 3D 2200XL

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated814
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNV1Venus
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 1995 (29 years ago)2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed60 MHz1015 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors1 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate0.0640.60
ROPs116
TMUs140

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Length191 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed60 MHz4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth480 MB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 28 nm

R9 A375 has a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Edge 3D 2200XL and Radeon R9 A375. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Edge 3D 2200XL
Edge 3D 2200XL
AMD Radeon R9 A375
Radeon R9 A375

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Edge 3D 2200XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R9 A375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.