Cedar: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Cedar provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 0.79% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.
Summary
This is a TeraScale 2 architecture desktop card based on 40 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Cedar: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
Place in the ranking | 1153 | |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | |
GPU code name | Cedar | |
Market segment | Desktop | |
Release date | no data |
Detailed specifications
Cedar's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Cedar's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090) |
Number of transistors | 292 million | of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB) |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | of 4 nm (H100 PCIe) |
ROPs | 4 | of 192 (GA100) |
TMUs | 8 | of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
API compatibility
APIs supported by Cedar, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Cedar. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
We have no data on Cedar benchmark results.
Send your test results of Cedar.
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Cedar is GeForce GT 610, which is faster by 3% and higher by 5 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Cedar:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Cedar according to our statistics.