Radeon RX 6950 XT vs CMP 170HX
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 17 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 27.11 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.18 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | GA100 | Navi 21 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2021 (3 years ago) | 10 May 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,299 | $1,099 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4480 | 5120 |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 2324 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 54,200 million | 26,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 335 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 394.8 | 743.7 |
| Floating-point processing power | 12.63 TFLOPS | 23.8 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 128 | 128 |
| TMUs | 280 | 320 |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 80 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | IGP | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1458 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 1,493 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | N/A | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | N/A | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2021 | 10 May 2022 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 335 Watt |
CMP 170HX has 34% lower power consumption.
RX 6950 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.
We couldn't decide between CMP 170HX and Radeon RX 6950 XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that CMP 170HX is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
