GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs CMP 170HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated11
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.26
Power efficiencyno data11.84
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA100GA102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 September 2021 (3 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,299 $1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448010752
Core clock speed1140 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz1860 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8625.0
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS40 TFLOPS
ROPs128112
TMUs280336
Tensor Cores280336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1458 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,493 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.08.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2021 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 450 Watt

CMP 170HX has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between CMP 170HX and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that CMP 170HX is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 17 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3237 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.