Radeon 760M vs Aubrey Isle

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data69.68
ArchitectureKnights (2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameKnights FerryPhoenix
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 May 2010 (14 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256512
Core clock speed1200 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistors2,300 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4083.17
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs3232
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth307.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2010 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Aubrey Isle and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Aubrey Isle is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Aubrey Isle
Aubrey Isle
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Aubrey Isle on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 157 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.