ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 vs Atari VCS 800 GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameBanded KestrelRS690
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 December 2020 (3 years ago)28 February 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million120 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate14.411.600
Floating-point processing power0.4612 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Length295 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2020 28 February 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm

Atari VCS 800 GPU has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atari VCS 800 GPU and Radeon Xpress 1250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atari VCS 800 GPU is a desktop card while Radeon Xpress 1250 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Atari VCS 800 GPU
Atari VCS 800 GPU
ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Radeon Xpress 1250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.