Quadro NVS 135M vs Atari VCS 800 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameBanded KestrelG86M
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date14 December 2020 (3 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19216
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate14.413.200
Floating-point performance0.4612 gflops0.0256 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Length295 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR3, GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/s600 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s9.504 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2020 9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Atari VCS 800 GPU has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 135M, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atari VCS 800 GPU and Quadro NVS 135M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atari VCS 800 GPU is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 135M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Atari VCS 800 GPU
Atari VCS 800 GPU
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
Quadro NVS 135M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 18 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 135M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.