3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB vs Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe-LPG (2023)Voodoo Scalable (2000)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake GT1VSA-101
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed300 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data14 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate56.000.33
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile and 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is a notebook card while 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 19 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.