HD Graphics P630 vs Arc Graphics 140V

Place in the ranking	383	762
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	14.32
Architecture	Xe² (2025)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Lunar Lake iGPU	Kaby Lake GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	no data	5 August 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	192
Core clock speed	no data	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	3 nm	14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	26.40
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	3
TMUs	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR5x	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	1740 MB
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.1.103

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc Graphics 140V 13.42
+330%

HD Graphics P630 3.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5158
+331%

HD Graphics P630 1198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40 +344%	9−10 −344%
1440p	20 +400%	4−5 −400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45 +309%	10−12 −309%
Elden Ring	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +450%	8−9 −450%
Counter-Strike 2	37 +236%	10−12 −236%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +457%	14−16 −457%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +517%	6−7 −517%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +200%	10−12 −200%
Valorant	50−55 +2550%	2−3 −2550%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +450%	8−9 −450%
Counter-Strike 2	30 +173%	10−12 −173%
Dota 2	44 +389%	9−10 −389%
Elden Ring	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%
Far Cry 5	35 +106%	16−18 −106%
Fortnite	75−80 +347%	16−18 −347%
Forza Horizon 4	65 +364%	14−16 −364%
Grand Theft Auto V	43 +378%	9−10 −378%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +517%	6−7 −517%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +254%	27−30 −254%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +200%	10−12 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +273%	10−12 −273%
Valorant	50−55 +2550%	2−3 −2550%
World of Tanks	170−180 +225%	55−60 −225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +450%	8−9 −450%
Counter-Strike 2	25 +127%	10−12 −127%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +200%	16−18 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +307%	14−16 −307%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +254%	27−30 −254%
Valorant	50−55 +2550%	2−3 −2550%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	18 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Elden Ring	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
World of Tanks	95−100 +332%	21−24 −332%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +800%	3−4 −800%
Counter-Strike 2	14 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +288%	8−9 −288%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +3100%	1−2 −3100%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +383%	6−7 −383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Valorant	30−35 +230%	10−11 −230%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Dota 2	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Elden Ring	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +333%	9−10 −333%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Fortnite	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20	0−1
Valorant	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and HD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

Arc Graphics 140V is 344% faster in 1080p
Arc Graphics 140V is 400% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 49 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 9 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.42	3.12
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	1740 MB
Chip lithography	3 nm	14 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 330.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 841.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook card while HD Graphics P630 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.