GMA 3150 vs Arc Graphics 140V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V and GMA 3150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 140V
16 GB LPDDR5x
13.47
+134600%

Arc Graphics 140V outperforms GMA 3150 by a whopping 134600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3921536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.05
ArchitectureXe² (2025)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUPineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores816
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140V 13.47
+134600%
GMA 3150 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5176
+258700%
GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41-0−1
1440p21-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 63 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 44 0−1
Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 37 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Far Cry 5 51 0−1
Fortnite 70−75 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30 0−1
Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Far Cry 5 45 0−1
Fortnite 70−75 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 44 0−1
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 25 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Far Cry 5 42 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110 0−1
Valorant 130−140 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 0−1
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Valorant 65−70 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.47 0.01
Chip lithography 3 nm 45 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 134600% higher aggregate performance score, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the GMA 3150 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 12 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 142 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.