UHD Graphics 610 vs Arc Graphics 130V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V and UHD Graphics 610, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130V
16 GB LPDDR5x
11.67
+517%

Arc Graphics 130V outperforms UHD Graphics 610 by a whopping 517% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking423919
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.64
ArchitectureXe² (2025)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUCoffee Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data3 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores796
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130V 11.67
+517%
UHD Graphics 610 1.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4485
+516%
UHD Graphics 610 728

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 130V 9523
+932%
UHD Graphics 610 923

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 130V 8255
+1144%
UHD Graphics 610 664

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc Graphics 130V 3242
+1571%
UHD Graphics 610 194

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD33
+313%
8
−313%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Counter-Strike 2 41
+413%
8−9
−413%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Far Cry 5 41
+925%
4
−925%
Fortnite 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Valorant 100−105
+163%
35−40
−163%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+250%
8−9
−250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+332%
35−40
−332%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Far Cry 5 37
+1133%
3
−1133%
Fortnite 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+1267%
3
−1267%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+625%
4
−625%
Valorant 100−105
+163%
35−40
−163%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+213%
8−9
−213%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Far Cry 5 33
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Valorant 100−105
+163%
35−40
−163%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+592%
12−14
−592%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+425%
12−14
−425%
Valorant 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Valorant 55−60
+544%
9−10
−544%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 12
+0%
12
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 11
+0%
11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and UHD Graphics 610 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 313% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 3200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is ahead in 52 tests (93%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.67 1.89
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 517.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 610 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 662 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or UHD Graphics 610, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.