Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs Arc A770M

Place in the ranking	183	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	51
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	34.26
Power efficiency	17.74	15.65
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-512	Navi 31
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2022 (3 years ago)	3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	6144
Core clock speed	1650 MHz	1929 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	2498 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	355 Watt
Texture fill rate	524.8	959.2
Floating-point processing power	16.79 TFLOPS	61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs	128	192
TMUs	256	384
Tensor Cores	512	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	32	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	287 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770M 30.92

RX 7900 XTX 80.72
+161%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770M 11888

RX 7900 XTX 31030
+161%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A770M 37375

RX 7900 XTX 83322
+123%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc A770M 77403

RX 7900 XTX 148746
+92.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A770M 25563

RX 7900 XTX 64680
+153%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A770M 124487

RX 7900 XTX 211480
+69.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95 −159%	246 +159%
1440p	54 −204%	164 +204%
4K	39 −167%	104 +167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.06
1440p	no data	6.09
4K	no data	9.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −257%	214 +257%
Cyberpunk 2077	113 −114%	242 +114%
Elden Ring	62 −263%	225 +263%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −30%	110−120 +30%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −302%	241 +302%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 −142%	116 +142%
Forza Horizon 4	256 −136%	604 +136%
Metro Exodus	100 −69%	169 +69%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −136%	150−160 +136%
Valorant	120−130 −281%	450−500 +281%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −30%	110−120 +30%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −267%	220 +267%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −167%	104 +167%
Dota 2	58 −216%	183 +216%
Elden Ring	100−110 −204%	300−350 +204%
Far Cry 5	56 −120%	123 +120%
Fortnite	140−150 −111%	300−350 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	211 −154%	535 +154%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 −103%	175 +103%
Metro Exodus	82 −115%	176 +115%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −20.1%	210−220 +20.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −136%	150−160 +136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 −67.3%	170−180 +67.3%
Valorant	120−130 −281%	450−500 +281%
World of Tanks	270−280 −1.5%	270−280 +1.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −30%	110−120 +30%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −235%	201 +235%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 −203%	100 +203%
Dota 2	100−110 −74.5%	178 +74.5%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −76.7%	150−160 +76.7%
Forza Horizon 4	179 −163%	471 +163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −20.1%	210−220 +20.1%
Valorant	120−130 −281%	450−500 +281%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	50−55 −206%	165 +206%
Elden Ring	55−60 −298%	230−240 +298%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −200%	165 +200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −221%	90−95 +221%
World of Tanks	200−210 −158%	500−550 +158%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −45%	85−90 +45%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −418%	145 +418%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 −223%	71 +223%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −66.7%	160−170 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −324%	360 +324%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −112%	146 +112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −386%	238 +386%
Valorant	85−90 −339%	350−400 +339%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −123%	67 +123%
Dota 2	45 −313%	186 +313%
Elden Ring	27−30 −374%	120−130 +374%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 −313%	186 +313%
Metro Exodus	37 −192%	108 +192%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −115%	200−210 +115%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −220%	60−65 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45 −313%	186 +313%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −168%	90−95 +168%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −43.3%	43 +43.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −227%	36 +227%
Dota 2	55−60 −184%	159 +184%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −144%	100−110 +144%
Fortnite	40−45 −134%	95−100 +134%
Forza Horizon 4	74 −166%	197 +166%
Valorant	45−50 −409%	220−230 +409%

This is how Arc A770M and RX 7900 XTX compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XTX is 159% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XTX is 204% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XTX is 167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 418% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7900 XTX is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.92	80.72
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	355 Watt

Arc A770M has 195.8% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has a 161.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.