T550 Mobile vs Arc A770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770 with T550 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Arc A770
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
33.90
+171%

Arc A770 outperforms T550 Mobile by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.23no data
Power efficiency10.3237.21
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG2-512TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961024
Core clock speed2100 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate614.4106.6
Floating-point processing power19.66 TFLOPS3.41 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs25664
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0No outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770 33.90
+171%
T550 Mobile 12.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770 13061
+171%
T550 Mobile 4811

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A770 41303
+412%
T550 Mobile 8067

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc A770 103295
+311%
T550 Mobile 25155

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A770 32666
+568%
T550 Mobile 4890

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A770 139166
+319%
T550 Mobile 33219

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
+127%
51
−127%
1440p65
+210%
21−24
−210%
4K41
+193%
14−16
−193%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.84no data
1440p5.06no data
4K8.02no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+160%
24−27
−160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+513%
14−16
−513%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+166%
30−35
−166%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+131%
27−30
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+116%
65−70
−116%
Hitman 3 50−55
+174%
18−20
−174%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+111%
55−60
−111%
Metro Exodus 144
+336%
30−35
−336%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+131%
27−30
−131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+159%
30−35
−159%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+64.1%
60−65
−64.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+24%
24−27
−24%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+427%
14−16
−427%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+166%
30−35
−166%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+131%
27−30
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+116%
65−70
−116%
Hitman 3 50−55
+174%
18−20
−174%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+111%
55−60
−111%
Metro Exodus 144
+336%
30−35
−336%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+131%
27−30
−131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 258
+514%
42
−514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+107%
27−30
−107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+64.1%
60−65
−64.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
+80%
24−27
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+380%
14−16
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−200%
65−70
+200%
Hitman 3 50−55
+174%
18−20
−174%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+116%
55−60
−116%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 216
+500%
36
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+260%
20
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 74
+15.6%
60−65
−15.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+131%
27−30
−131%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+145%
20−22
−145%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+300%
10−11
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+900%
6−7
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+215%
45−50
−215%
Hitman 3 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
+376%
21−24
−376%
Metro Exodus 91
+507%
14−16
−507%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
+1029%
14−16
−1029%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+500%
10−11
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+123%
65−70
−123%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+153%
16−18
−153%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Hitman 3 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+193%
45−50
−193%
Metro Exodus 83
+938%
8−9
−938%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+813%
8−9
−813%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+400%
6−7
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+660%
5−6
−660%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 8
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 89
+1171%
7−8
−1171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 37
+825%
4−5
−825%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

This is how Arc A770 and T550 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 127% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 210% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 193% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770 is 1171% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T550 Mobile is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is ahead in 70 tests (97%)
  • T550 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.90 12.49
Recency 12 October 2022 on May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 23 Watt

Arc A770 has a 171.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

T550 Mobile, on the other hand, has 878.3% lower power consumption.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the T550 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770 is a desktop card while T550 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
NVIDIA T550 Mobile
T550 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5322 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 26 votes

Rate T550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.