Radeon PRO W7700 vs Arc A580

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A580 with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

Arc A580
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
30.27

PRO W7700 outperforms Arc A580 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking18261
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.20
Power efficiency12.0618.28
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 October 2023 (1 year ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723072
Core clock speed1700 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0499.2
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs192192
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores2448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.04x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A580 30.27
PRO W7700 49.84
+64.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A580 11677
PRO W7700 19227
+64.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD105
−61.9%
170−180
+61.9%
1440p55
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
4K33
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.88
1440pno data11.10
4Kno data19.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 103
−55.3%
160−170
+55.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−57.9%
210−220
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−54.8%
130−140
+54.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−56.9%
160−170
+56.9%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−52.3%
300−310
+52.3%
Hitman 3 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−63.7%
280−290
+63.7%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−60.3%
210−220
+60.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−57.9%
150−160
+57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
−62.3%
250−260
+62.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−59.1%
210−220
+59.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 102
−56.9%
160−170
+56.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−57.9%
210−220
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−54.8%
130−140
+54.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−56.9%
160−170
+56.9%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−52.3%
300−310
+52.3%
Hitman 3 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−63.7%
280−290
+63.7%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−60.3%
210−220
+60.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−57.9%
150−160
+57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 214
−63.6%
350−400
+63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−62.8%
140−150
+62.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−59.1%
210−220
+59.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−54.8%
130−140
+54.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Forza Horizon 4 87
−60.9%
140−150
+60.9%
Hitman 3 85−90
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 109
−56%
170−180
+56%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 177
−63.8%
290−300
+63.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−57.9%
150−160
+57.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−60.5%
130−140
+60.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
−57.4%
85−90
+57.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−52.2%
350−400
+52.2%
Hitman 3 55−60
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
−60.9%
140−150
+60.9%
Metro Exodus 91
−53.8%
140−150
+53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
−61.5%
210−220
+61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
−51.5%
300−310
+51.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
−52.8%
110−120
+52.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−59.6%
300−310
+59.6%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−57.4%
85−90
+57.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
−50%
45−50
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 56
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%

This is how Arc A580 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7700 is 64% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7700 is 52% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.27 49.84
Recency 10 October 2023 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 190 Watt

Arc A580 has 8.6% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 64.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A580 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A580
Arc A580
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 253 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.