Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Arc A550M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.29no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2022 (2 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed900 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate262.4162.0
Floating-point processing power8.397 TFLOPS10.37 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs12880
Tensor Cores25680
Ray Tracing Cores1620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 35 Watt

Arc A550M has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A550M and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A550M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 74 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.