RTX A1000 Mobile vs Arc A380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A380 with RTX A1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Arc A380
2022
6 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
16.14

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Arc A380 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking334222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.12no data
Power efficiency14.7528.24
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128GA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date14 June 2022 (2 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed2000 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate131.272.96
Floating-point processing power4.198 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464
Tensor Cores12864
Ray Tracing Cores816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length222 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1937 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth186.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A380 16.14
RTX A1000 Mobile 24.72
+53.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A380 6219
RTX A1000 Mobile 9527
+53.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A380 13892
RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
+8.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc A380 53979
RTX A1000 Mobile 58312
+8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A380 10174
RTX A1000 Mobile 11321
+11.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A380 60804
RTX A1000 Mobile 70880
+16.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−46.8%
69
+46.8%
1440p16−18
−68.8%
27
+68.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.17no data
1440p9.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
+19.6%
50−55
−19.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+29.3%
75−80
−29.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+29.8%
45−50
−29.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+26.4%
50−55
−26.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+24.6%
60−65
−24.6%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+19.7%
130−140
−19.7%
Hitman 3 60−65
+34.8%
45−50
−34.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+22.2%
100−110
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+27.8%
75−80
−27.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+23%
60−65
−23%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+33.8%
75−80
−33.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+14.1%
95−100
−14.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72
+41.2%
50−55
−41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+12.1%
33
−12.1%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+29.3%
75−80
−29.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+29.8%
45−50
−29.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+26.4%
50−55
−26.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+24.6%
60−65
−24.6%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+19.7%
130−140
−19.7%
Hitman 3 60−65
+34.8%
45−50
−34.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+22.2%
100−110
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+27.8%
75−80
−27.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+23%
60−65
−23%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
−8.8%
87
+8.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+26%
50−55
−26%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+14.1%
95−100
−14.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
−75.9%
50−55
+75.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+24%
25
−24%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+29.8%
45−50
−29.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+26.4%
50−55
−26.4%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−140%
130−140
+140%
Hitman 3 60−65
+34.8%
45−50
−34.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 52
−108%
100−110
+108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
−24.6%
76
+24.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−26.5%
43
+26.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
−4%
26
+4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+23%
60−65
−23%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+27.3%
40−45
−27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+40.9%
22
−40.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+30.5%
130−140
−30.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+31.9%
45−50
−31.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+32.6%
40−45
−32.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+38.8%
45−50
−38.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+21.2%
130−140
−21.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+25.2%
110−120
−25.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+32.3%
30−35
−32.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 29
+0%
29
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Arc A380 and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 47% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 69% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A380 is 42% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 140% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is ahead in 58 tests (81%)
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 7 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.14 24.72
Recency 14 June 2022 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

Arc A380 has an age advantage of 2 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 53.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 25% lower power consumption.

The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A380 is a desktop card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A380
Arc A380
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 836 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 88 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.