RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Arc A370M

Place in the ranking	380	33
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	26.35	27.65
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-128	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	7424
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1550 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	99.20	no data
Floating-point processing power	3.174 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	64	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A370M 13.26

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.65
+350%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 23017
+350%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40 −325%	170−180 +325%
1440p	21 −329%	90−95 +329%
4K	34 −341%	150−160 +341%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

46
−335%

200−210

+335%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	33 −324%	140−150 +324%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −331%	220−230 +331%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −338%	140−150 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 −332%	160−170 +332%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −332%	160−170 +332%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −341%	450−500 +341%
Hitman 3	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −338%	350−400 +338%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −344%	240−250 +344%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −331%	220−230 +331%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −338%	350−400 +338%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20 −325%	85−90 +325%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −331%	220−230 +331%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −338%	140−150 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −340%	110−120 +340%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −332%	160−170 +332%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −341%	450−500 +341%
Hitman 3	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −338%	350−400 +338%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −344%	240−250 +344%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	62 −335%	270−280 +335%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −332%	160−170 +332%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −338%	350−400 +338%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 −344%	80−85 +344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −338%	140−150 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 −329%	90−95 +329%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −332%	160−170 +332%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −341%	450−500 +341%
Hitman 3	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −338%	350−400 +338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 −334%	230−240 +334%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −323%	110−120 +323%
Watch Dogs: Legion	15 −333%	65−70 +333%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
−342%

190−200

+342%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −319%	130−140 +319%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 −323%	55−60 +323%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −341%	75−80 +341%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −344%	80−85 +344%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −317%	350−400 +317%
Hitman 3	18−20 −347%	85−90 +347%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −338%	140−150 +338%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 −332%	160−170 +332%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −341%	75−80 +341%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −317%	400−450 +317%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
−323%

110−120

+323%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −333%	65−70 +333%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Hitman 3	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −338%	350−400 +338%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −333%	65−70 +333%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −329%	90−95 +329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−329%

60−65
+329%

This is how Arc A370M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 325% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 329% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 341% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.26	59.65
Recency	30 March 2022	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt

Arc A370M has 328.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 349.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.