Arctic Sound 2T vs Arc A350M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking355not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency41.07no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameDG2-128Arctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687680
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate55.20216.0
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS
ROPs24120
TMUs48240
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 500 Watt

Arc A350M has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 56 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.