Arc 3 A370M vs H100 SXM5

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureHopper (2022−2023)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGH100DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84481024
Core clock speed1065 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1780 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors80,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)700 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate939.899.20
Floating-point processing power30.07 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs52864
Tensor Cores528no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount80 GB4 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth1,920 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA9.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 80 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 700 Watt 35 Watt

H100 SXM5 has a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Arc 3 A370M, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between H100 SXM5 and Arc 3 A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that H100 SXM5 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 3 A370M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA H100 SXM5
H100 SXM5
Intel Arc 3 A370M
Arc 3 A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 27 votes

Rate H100 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 12 votes

Rate Arc 3 A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.