Tesla M6 Mobile vs Arc A310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking367not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe HPG (2022−2023)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameAlchemistGM204
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2022 (2 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61536
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1180 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt (40 - 75 Watt TGP)100 Watt
Texture fill rate64.00113.3
Floating-point performance3.072 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed15500 MHz5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth124.0 GB/s160.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2022 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

Arc A310 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla M6 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Arc A310 and Tesla M6 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A310 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M6 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A310
Arc A310
NVIDIA Tesla M6 Mobile
Tesla M6 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 239 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Tesla M6 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.