RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Arc A310

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A310 with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Arc A310
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
14.23

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Arc A310 by a whopping 283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking36346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.1453.99
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686144
Core clock speed2000 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate64.00299.5
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32192
Tensor Cores96192
Ray Tracing Cores648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1937 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth124.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A310 14.23
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.57
+283%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A310 5492
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 21055
+283%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
−268%
140−150
+268%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−275%
150−160
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−273%
220−230
+273%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−281%
160−170
+281%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−275%
180−190
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−254%
400−450
+254%
Hitman 3 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−241%
300−310
+241%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−271%
230−240
+271%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−273%
220−230
+273%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−249%
300−310
+249%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−275%
150−160
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−273%
220−230
+273%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−281%
160−170
+281%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−275%
180−190
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−254%
400−450
+254%
Hitman 3 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−241%
300−310
+241%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−271%
230−240
+271%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65
−269%
240−250
+269%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−249%
300−310
+249%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−275%
150−160
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−281%
160−170
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−254%
400−450
+254%
Hitman 3 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−241%
300−310
+241%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
−270%
200−210
+270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−279%
110−120
+279%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−249%
300−310
+249%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−257%
350−400
+257%
Hitman 3 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−270%
400−450
+270%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Hitman 3 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−280%
350−400
+280%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%

This is how Arc A310 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 268% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.23 54.57
Recency 12 October 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 283.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A310 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A310 is a desktop card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A310
Arc A310
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 244 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.