GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs Arc A310

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A310 and GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A310
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
14.23

RTX 3060 8 GB outperforms Arc A310 by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking367108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.0616.19
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128GA106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584
Core clock speed2000 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate64.00199.0
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS12.74 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs32112
Tensor Cores96112
Ray Tracing Cores628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1937 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth124.0 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A310 14.23
RTX 3060 8 GB 39.97
+181%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A310 5472
RTX 3060 8 GB 15364
+181%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−170%
100−110
+170%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 32
−166%
85−90
+166%
Elden Ring 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Counter-Strike 2 26
−169%
70−75
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 80
−175%
220−230
+175%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Counter-Strike 2 26
−169%
70−75
+169%
Dota 2 28
−168%
75−80
+168%
Elden Ring 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−164%
140−150
+164%
Fortnite 80−85
−175%
220−230
+175%
Forza Horizon 4 65
−177%
180−190
+177%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
−168%
75−80
+168%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−172%
280−290
+172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%
World of Tanks 180−190
−167%
500−550
+167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−164%
140−150
+164%
Forza Horizon 4 54
−178%
150−160
+178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−172%
280−290
+172%
Valorant 55−60
−181%
160−170
+181%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Elden Ring 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−150%
300−310
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
World of Tanks 100−105
−180%
280−290
+180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−179%
95−100
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−179%
95−100
+179%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−174%
85−90
+174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Valorant 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Dota 2 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Elden Ring 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Fortnite 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Valorant 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

This is how Arc A310 and RTX 3060 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 170% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.23 39.97
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 170 Watt

Arc A310 has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 126.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 180.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A310
Arc A310
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 260 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 776 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.