Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, including specs and performance data.
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 308 | 70 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 89.95 |
Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2023) |
GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | Navi 22 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) | 17 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 2304 |
Boost clock speed | 2300 MHz | 2450 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 17,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 170 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 352.8 |
ROPs | no data | 64 |
TMUs | no data | 144 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 267 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 10 GB |
Memory bus width | no data | 160 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 16 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 40
−150%
| 100−110
+150%
|
1440p | 16
−150%
| 40−45
+150%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−168%
|
110−120
+168%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−33
−167%
|
80−85
+167%
|
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−171%
|
160−170
+171%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
−170%
|
100−105
+170%
|
Far Cry 5 | 37
−170%
|
100−105
+170%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−165%
|
130−140
+165%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
−163%
|
300−310
+163%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
−171%
|
95−100
+171%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 33
−173%
|
90−95
+173%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
−165%
|
130−140
+165%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
−171%
|
160−170
+171%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
−164%
|
230−240
+164%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−168%
|
110−120
+168%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−33
−167%
|
80−85
+167%
|
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−171%
|
160−170
+171%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
−170%
|
100−105
+170%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35
−171%
|
95−100
+171%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−165%
|
130−140
+165%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
−163%
|
300−310
+163%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
−171%
|
95−100
+171%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27
−159%
|
70−75
+159%
|
Metro Exodus | 60−65
−158%
|
160−170
+158%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
−165%
|
130−140
+165%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
−171%
|
160−170
+171%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 43
−156%
|
110−120
+156%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
−164%
|
230−240
+164%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−168%
|
110−120
+168%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−33
−167%
|
80−85
+167%
|
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−171%
|
160−170
+171%
|
Far Cry 5 | 33
−173%
|
90−95
+173%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−165%
|
130−140
+165%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
−163%
|
300−310
+163%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 23
−161%
|
60−65
+161%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
−164%
|
230−240
+164%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
−150%
|
50−55
+150%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
−162%
|
55−60
+162%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40
−170%
|
100−105
+170%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−35
−173%
|
90−95
+173%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
−167%
|
80−85
+167%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 35−40
−164%
|
95−100
+164%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 18−20
−150%
|
45−50
+150%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
−150%
|
40−45
+150%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−171%
|
95−100
+171%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−162%
|
55−60
+162%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
−168%
|
75−80
+168%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 95−100
−173%
|
270−280
+173%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
−150%
|
50−55
+150%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 100−110
−166%
|
290−300
+166%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
−150%
|
35−40
+150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 90−95
−169%
|
250−260
+169%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
−163%
|
50−55
+163%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
−150%
|
40−45
+150%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 20−22
−150%
|
50−55
+150%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−150%
|
45−50
+150%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−150%
|
45−50
+150%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−170%
|
27−30
+170%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
−150%
|
35−40
+150%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−160%
|
65−70
+160%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and RX 6750 GRE 10 GB compete in popular games:
- RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 150% faster in 1080p
- RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 150% faster in 1440p
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 17.53 | 47.87 |
Recency | 14 December 2023 | 17 October 2023 |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Arc 8-Cores iGPU has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, on the other hand, has a 173.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.
Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.