Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
17.53

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30870
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data89.95
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)17 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82304
Boost clock speed2300 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data352.8
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data10 GB
Memory bus widthno data160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
−150%
100−110
+150%
1440p16
−150%
40−45
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−171%
160−170
+171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Far Cry 5 37
−170%
100−105
+170%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−163%
300−310
+163%
Hitman 3 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
−173%
90−95
+173%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−171%
160−170
+171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−164%
230−240
+164%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−171%
160−170
+171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Far Cry 5 35
−171%
95−100
+171%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−163%
300−310
+163%
Hitman 3 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
−159%
70−75
+159%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−158%
160−170
+158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−171%
160−170
+171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−156%
110−120
+156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−164%
230−240
+164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−171%
160−170
+171%
Far Cry 5 33
−173%
90−95
+173%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−163%
300−310
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−161%
60−65
+161%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−164%
230−240
+164%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Hitman 3 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−164%
95−100
+164%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−173%
270−280
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−166%
290−300
+166%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Hitman 3 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−169%
250−260
+169%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and RX 6750 GRE 10 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 150% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 150% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.53 47.87
Recency 14 December 2023 17 October 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm

Arc 8-Cores iGPU has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, on the other hand, has a 173.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 59 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 20 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.