Radeon R9 370 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU with Radeon R9 370, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
18.52
+50.8%

Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms R9 370 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking301406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.70
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUTrinidad
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81280
Core clock speedno data925 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz975 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data78.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.496 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data221 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 18.52
+50.8%
R9 370 12.28

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 8561
+63.1%
R9 370 5249

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−25%
45
+25%
1440p20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
4K15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Elden Ring 30
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Metro Exodus 40
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Valorant 75−80
+66.7%
45−50
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Dota 2 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Elden Ring 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Far Cry 5 34
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Fortnite 95−100
+52.3%
65−70
−52.3%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Metro Exodus 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+58.8%
80−85
−58.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Valorant 75−80
+66.7%
45−50
−66.7%
World of Tanks 220−230
+58.6%
140−150
−58.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+60%
40−45
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+58.8%
80−85
−58.8%
Valorant 75−80
+66.7%
45−50
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 11
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Elden Ring 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+51.8%
110−120
−51.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
World of Tanks 120−130
+58.8%
80−85
−58.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Valorant 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Dota 2 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
Elden Ring 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+80%
5−6
−80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Fortnite 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Valorant 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and R9 370 compete in popular games:

  • R9 370 is 25% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 67% faster in 1440p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 67% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.52 12.28
Recency 14 December 2023 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 50.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook card while Radeon R9 370 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
AMD Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 46 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 424 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.