P106-100 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU
VS
P102-100 P102-101 P104-100 P104-101 P106-090 P106-100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
18.52
+7.7%

Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms P106-100 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU
P106-100 P106-100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking311331
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.82
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)19 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81280
Core clock speedno data1506 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1709 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data136.7
Floating-point processing powerno data4.375 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+16.7%
30−35
−16.7%
1440p18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
4K16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 53
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Counter-Strike 2 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry 5 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Fortnite 90−95
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Valorant 130−140
+11.7%
120−130
−11.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+9%
200−210
−9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry 5 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Fortnite 90−95
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+19%
21−24
−19%
Metro Exodus 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Valorant 130−140
+11.7%
120−130
−11.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry 5 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Valorant 130−140
+11.7%
120−130
−11.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+15.5%
110−120
−15.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+10.7%
150−160
−10.7%
Valorant 160−170
+12.7%
150−160
−12.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Valorant 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and P106-100 compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 17% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 13% faster in 1440p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 18.52 17.19
Recency 14 December 2023 19 June 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 16 nm

Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 7.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc 8-Core iGPU and P106-100.

Be aware that Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
P106-100 P106 100
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
Arc A530M Arc A530M
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
P5200 Max-Q Max-Q
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
Pro WX 3200 WX 3200
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
vs
HD 8280 8280
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB NVIDIA 4060 Ti 16 GB
vs
GTX 750 v2 750 v2
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 4060 Ti 16 GB
Arc 8-Core iGPU Intel 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
Arc 7-Core iGPU Intel 7 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1050 Ti 1050 Ti
Arc 7-Core iGPU Intel 7 Core iGPU
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Graphics G7 80EUs
Arc 7-Core iGPU Intel 7 Core iGPU
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Graphics 770
K4000M Quadro K4000M
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 3050 Ti Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 57 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 209 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc 8-Core iGPU or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.