P106-100 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
18.48
+10.5%

Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms P106-100 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.54
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)19 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81280
Core clock speedno data1506 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1709 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data136.7
Floating-point processing powerno data4.375 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+20%
30−35
−20%
1440p19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
4K13
+30%
10−12
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+17%
100−105
−17%
Hitman 3 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+17%
100−105
−17%
Hitman 3 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
+16%
50−55
−16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+17%
100−105
−17%
Hitman 3 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+13.3%
90−95
−13.3%
Hitman 3 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+11%
100−105
−11%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and P106-100 compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 20% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 19% faster in 1440p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.48 16.72
Recency 14 December 2023 19 June 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 16 nm

Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 10.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook card while P106-100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 33 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 182 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.