A800 PCIe 40 GB vs Arc 3 A350M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)8 November 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686912
Core clock speedno data765 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate55.20609.1
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs24160
TMUs48432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB40 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed12 GB/s1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s1,555 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.6N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 8 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

Arc 3 A350M has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

A800 PCIe 40 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Arc 3 A350M and A800 PCIe 40 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc 3 A350M is a desktop card while A800 PCIe 40 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 3 A350M
Arc 3 A350M
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 40 GB
A800 PCIe 40 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Arc 3 A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A800 PCIe 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.