Radeon R9 M370X vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon R9 M370X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms R9 M370X by a whopping 242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 389 | 706 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
| GPU code name | no data | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 19 May 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1500 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 4500 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12 (FL 11_1) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
−21.4%
| 34
+21.4%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 30−35
+256%
|
9−10
−256%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+407%
|
14−16
−407%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 30−35
+256%
|
9−10
−256%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+300%
|
14−16
−300%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+407%
|
14−16
−407%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+389%
|
9−10
−389%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+252%
|
21−24
−252%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+200%
|
18−20
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+344%
|
9−10
−344%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+113%
|
50−55
−113%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 30−35
+256%
|
9−10
−256%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+300%
|
14−16
−300%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+407%
|
14−16
−407%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
+73.8%
|
103
−73.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Dota 2 | 85−90
+150%
|
30−35
−150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+389%
|
9−10
−389%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+252%
|
21−24
−252%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+200%
|
18−20
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+344%
|
9−10
−344%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 45−50
+308%
|
12−14
−308%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+271%
|
7−8
−271%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+133%
|
15
−133%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+113%
|
50−55
−113%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+300%
|
14−16
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Dota 2 | 85−90
+150%
|
30−35
−150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+389%
|
9−10
−389%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+200%
|
18−20
−200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+338%
|
8
−338%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+113%
|
50−55
−113%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 70−75
+252%
|
21−24
−252%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+380%
|
5−6
−380%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
+243%
|
27−30
−243%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+567%
|
3−4
−567%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+263%
|
30−33
−263%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+249%
|
35−40
−249%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+250%
|
10−11
−250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+244%
|
9−10
−244%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8
−300%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 10−11
+233%
|
3−4
−233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+268%
|
18−20
−268%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+283%
|
12−14
−283%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and R9 M370X compete in popular games:
- R9 M370X is 21% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 650% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Apple M1 8-Core GPU surpassed R9 M370X in all 57 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.82 | 3.46 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 19 May 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 241.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M370X in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
