Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Apollo Lake GT1 5

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated86
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.54
Power efficiencyno data13.30
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1 5Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442560
Core clock speedno data1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data304.8
Floating-point processing powerno data9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs18160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

RX 5700 XT has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Apollo Lake GT1 5 and Radeon RX 5700 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Apollo Lake GT1 5
Apollo Lake GT1 5
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7746 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.