Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRV350Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 April 2005 (19 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16384
Core clock speed324 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors60 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data2400 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2961,638
Floating-point processing powerno data52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs41024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed196 MHz1565 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.272 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2005 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition is a desktop card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition
All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 81 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.