Radeon RX 6900 vs AeroBox GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated22
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.83
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKryptosNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2020 (4 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8964608
Core clock speed935 MHzno data
Boost clock speed985 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistorsno data23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate55.16606.2
Floating-point processing power1.765 TFLOPS19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs56288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.11.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2020 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 255 Watt

AeroBox GPU has 155% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 66 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.