Radeon 890M vs AeroBox GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data100.00
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameKryptosStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2020 (4 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961024
Core clock speed935 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed985 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate55.16185.6
Floating-point processing power1.765 TFLOPS5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs5664
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1066 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and Radeon 890M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a notebook card while Radeon 890M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 96 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.