Tesla M2075 vs A100 SXM4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGA100GF110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912448
Core clock speed1410 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate609.132.14
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs16048
TMUs43256
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount40 GB6 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz783 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s150.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 200 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 566.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla M2075, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Tesla M2075. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.