Radeon RX 6300 vs A100 SXM4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.71
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA100Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912768
Core clock speed1410 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate609.197.92
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs16032
TMUs43248
Tensor Cores432no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount40 GB2 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x HDMI 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 32 Watt

A100 SXM4 has a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6300, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Radeon RX 6300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.