Radeon Instinct MI300X vs A100 SXM4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameGA100Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691219456
Core clock speed1410 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2100 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate609.12,554
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs160no data
TMUs4321216
Tensor Cores4321216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EHBM3
Maximum RAM amount40 GB192 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 192 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 750 Watt

A100 SXM4 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 380% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 57 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.