Radeon E9260 PCIe vs A100 SXM4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGA100Baffin
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)27 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912896
Core clock speed1410 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate609.157.60
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs16016
TMUs43248
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount40 GB4 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2.131
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 27 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 80 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

E9260 PCIe, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Radeon E9260 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation card while Radeon E9260 PCIe is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
Radeon E9260 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E9260 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.